The Difference Between Jesus and Religion (Mark 2:18-3:6) - 2/25/26

INTRO

Mark’s controversy cycle escalates (2:1–3:6): questions and accusation.
The real issue isn’t fasting or Sabbath rules… it’s Jesus’ identity and authority.
Religion and the Gospel

Fasting — Old and New – 2:18–22

Question (v.18): Why don’t Your disciples fast like the other religious groups?
Jesus’ answer (vv.19–20):
- Bridegroom present = joy and celebration; fasting fits seasons of mourning/need.
- “Taken away” points to His coming suffering; then fasting becomes longing for Christ.
Jesus’ point (vv.21–22):
- New patch/old garment: you can’t “add Jesus” to self-righteous religion.
- New wine/old wineskins: gospel life requires grace-shaped forms, not rigid containers.

Accusation (v.24): Why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?
Jesus answers with Scripture (vv.25–26):
- David’s example shows need and mercy align with God’s heart.
- “Have you not read?” exposes knowledge of rules without grasping Scripture’s intent.
Jesus clarifies the Sabbath (v.27):
- Sabbath is a gift for rest and worship, not a burden for control.
Jesus’ claim (v.28):
- Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath—He has authority to define and correct its use.

Trap (v.2): they watch to accuse Him if He heals.
Jesus’ question (v.4):
- lawful to do good/save life or harm/kill?
- refusing mercy when able is not holiness—it’s sin.
Jesus acts (v.5):
- grieved at hardness of heart; heals by command—restoring power on display.
Escalation (v.6):
- accusation becomes conspiracy—plotting to destroy Him; the conflict is about rejecting the Lord.

The What Now